Philippe Leroyer | Flickr (CC BY-NC-ND 2.0)

Special Focus

AWID is an international, feminist, membership organisation committed to achieving gender equality, sustainable development and women’s human rights

Women Human Rights Defenders

WHRDs are self-identified women and lesbian, bisexual, transgender, queer and intersex (LBTQI) people and others who defend rights and are subject to gender-specific risks and threats due to their human rights work and/or as a direct consequence of their gender identity or sexual orientation.

WHRDs are subject to systematic violence and discrimination due to their identities and unyielding struggles for rights, equality and justice.

The WHRD Program collaborates with international and regional partners as well as the AWID membership to raise awareness about these risks and threats, advocate for feminist and holistic measures of protection and safety, and actively promote a culture of self-care and collective well being in our movements.


Risks and threats targeting WHRDs  

WHRDs are exposed to the same types of risks that all other defenders who defend human rights, communities, and the environment face. However, they are also exposed to gender-based violence and gender-specific risks because they challenge existing gender norms within their communities and societies.

By defending rights, WHRDs are at risk of:

  • Physical assault and death
  • Intimidation and harassment, including in online spaces
  • Judicial harassment and criminalization
  • Burnout

A collaborative, holistic approach to safety

We work collaboratively with international and regional networks and our membership

  • to raise awareness about human rights abuses and violations against WHRDs and the systemic violence and discrimination they experience
  • to strengthen protection mechanisms and ensure more effective and timely responses to WHRDs at risk

We work to promote a holistic approach to protection which includes:

  • emphasizing the importance of self-care and collective well being, and recognizing that what care and wellbeing mean may differ across cultures
  • documenting the violations targeting WHRDs using a feminist intersectional perspective;
  • promoting the social recognition and celebration of the work and resilience of WHRDs ; and
  • building civic spaces that are conducive to dismantling structural inequalities without restrictions or obstacles

Our Actions

We aim to contribute to a safer world for WHRDs, their families and communities. We believe that action for rights and justice should not put WHRDs at risk; it should be appreciated and celebrated.

  • Promoting collaboration and coordination among human rights and women’s rights organizations at the international level to  strengthen  responses concerning safety and wellbeing of WHRDs.

  • Supporting regional networks of WHRDs and their organizations, such as the Mesoamerican Initiative for WHRDs and the WHRD Middle East and North Africa  Coalition, in promoting and strengthening collective action for protection - emphasizing the establishment of solidarity and protection networks, the promotion of self-care, and advocacy and mobilization for the safety of WHRDs;

  • Increasing the visibility and recognition of  WHRDs and their struggles, as well as the risks that they encounter by documenting the attacks that they face, and researching, producing, and disseminating information on their struggles, strategies, and challenges:

  • Mobilizing urgent responses of international solidarity for WHRDs at risk through our international and regional networks, and our active membership.

Related Content

Snippet FEA EoS The Ivy (FR)

An illustration of a vine with vine like leaves in neon with purple background

Le lierre
Communauté et quartier

9. Advocate and tell the world!

The results of your research will also shape your advocacy – for example, your results will have revealed which sectors fund the most and which sectors you feel need donor education.

In this section

Build your advocacy strategy

In the “Frame your research” section of this toolkit we recommend that you plot out what goals you hope to accomplish with your research. These goals will allow you to build an advocacy strategy once your research is complete.

An advocacy strategy is a plan of distributing your research results in a way that allows you to accomplish your goals, falling under the broader goal of advocating with key sectors to make positive changes for resources for women’s rights organizing.

Using the goals defined in your research framing:

  • List the potential groups of contacts who can be interested in your research results
  • For each group, explain in one sentence how they can help you achieve your goal.
  • For each group, mark what tone you are supposed to use to talk to them (formal professional, commentary casual, do they understand the field’s jargon?)
  • List every media that can allow you to reach these audiences, in the proper tone (social media to build community feeling, press release for official announcement to a general audience, etc.)

From this list – as exhaustive as possible, chose which ones are the most efficient for achieve your goals. (See below for specific examples of audiences and advocacy methods)

Once you have a strategy, you can start the dissemination.

Back to top


Reach out to your network

To disseminate your results, reach out first to the contacts through whom you distributed your survey, as well as to all your survey and interview participants.

  • First, take this opportunity to thank them for contributing to this research.
  • Share with them the main survey results and analysis.
  • Make it easy for them to disseminate your product through their networks by giving them samples of tweets, Facebook posts or even a short introduction that they could copy and paste on their website.

Do not forget to state clearly a contact person and ask for a confirmation once they have published it.

On top of making you able to track who disseminated your report, it will help build stronger relationships within your network.

Back to top


Adapt your strategy to the sector

As an example, we present below a list of sectors AWID engages in advocacy.

  • Use this list as a point of departure to develop your own sector-specific advocacy plan.
  • Create an objective for what you hope to accomplish for each sector.
  • Be sure to add any additional sectors to this list that are relevant for your particular research, such as local NGOs or local governments, for example.

Your list of advisory organizations and individuals will also be useful here. They can help you disseminate the report in different spaces, as well as introduce you to new organizations or advocacy spaces.

1. Women’s rights organizations

Sample objectives: Update women’s rights organizations on funding trends; brainstorm collaborative efforts for resource mobilization using research findings; influence how they approach resource mobilization

Examples of possible advocacy methods:

  • Offer seminars, learning cafés or other events throughout your region, in relevant languages, in order to update women’s rights organizations with the findings of your research.

  • If you can’t physically reach everyone in your region, think about setting-up a webinar and online presentations.

  • Present your findings at larger convenings, such as the Commission on the Status of Women (CSW).

  • Beyond your own organizations’ newsletters and website, write articles on different platforms that are frequented by your target audience.
    Some examples: World Pulse, OpenDemocracy, feministing.

2. Bilaterals and multilaterals

Sample Objective: Raising awareness about how funding is not meeting established commitments and how this sector needs to improve funding mechanisms to finance women’s rights organizing.

Identify which bilateral & multilaterals have the most influence on funding – this could include local embassies.

Examples of possible advocacy methods:

  • Enlist ally organizations and influential individuals (some may already be your advisors for this research process) to do peer education.
  • Seek their assistance to disseminate research finding widely in large multilaterals (like the UN).
  • Present at and/or attend influential spaces where bilaterals and multilaterals are present, such as GENDERNET .
  • Publish articles in outlets that are read by bilaterals and multilaterals such as devex, Better Aid, Publish What You Pay.

3. Private foundations

Sample Objective: Expand the quality and quantity of support for women’s rights organizations.

Examples of possible advocacy methods:

4. Women’s funds

Sample Objective: Encourage them to continue their work at higher scale.

Examples of possible advocacy methods:

  • Hold presentations at the women’s funds in your region and in countries that you hope to influence.
  • Disseminate your research findings to all women’s funds that impact the region, priority issue or population you are focusing on.
  • Consider doing joint efforts based on the results of the findings. For example, you could propose to collaborate with a fund to develop an endowment  that closes the funding gaps found in your research.

5. Private sector and new donors

Sample Objective: Increase their understanding of the field and encourage coherence between their philanthropic interests and business practice.

Examples of possible advocacy methods:

  • Enlist ally organizations and influential individuals (some may already be your advisors for this research process) to do peer education.
  • Arrange meetings with influential private actors to present your research findings.
  • Host your own meeting, inviting private sector actors, to share the findings and to advocate for your position.

Make sure to adapt your presentations, propositions and applications to each targeted group.

Back to top


Previous step

8. Finalize and format


Are you ready to start your own research?

We strongly recommend referring to our Ready to Go worksheet to assess your own advancement.


Estimated time:

• 1-2 years, depending on advocacy goals

People needed:

• 1 or more communications person(s)

Resources needed:       

• List of spaces to advertise research
• List of blogs and online magazines where you can publish articles about your research finding
• List of advisors
• Your WITM information products
Sample of Advocacy Plan


Previous step

8. Finalize and format


Ready to Go? Worksheet

Download the toolkit in PDF

Is the WITM survey accessible for people with disabilities?

Yes, the survey is accessible to people with a diverse range of hearing, movement, sight, and cognitive abilities.

Snippet FEA We are living in a world (EN)

We are living in a world where the destruction of Nature fuels our current global economy.

Even in times of climate crisis, governments continue to encourage large-scale agriculture industries to expand. These activities poison the land, threaten biodiversity, and destroy local food production and livelihoods. Meanwhile, while women produce the majority of our food in the world, they own almost none of the land.

What if we perceived land and Nature not as private property to exploit, but as a whole to live in, learn from, and harmoniously coexist with? What if we repaired our relationships with the land and embraced more sustainable alternatives that nurture both the planet and its communities?

Nous Sommes la Solution (We Are the Solution, NSS) is one of many women-led movements striving to do this. This is their story.

Elisa Badayos

Elisa era coordinadora de la organización de derechos humanos Karapatan, en la Provincia de Negros Oriental de Filipinas.

También era organizadora de comunidades urbanas empobrecidas de la Provincia de Cebú, y trabajaba con Desaparecidos, una organización de familiares de personas desaparecidas.

Elisa y dos de sus colegas fueron asesinadxs el 28 de noviembre de 2017 por dos hombres no identificados en Barangay San Ramón, en la ciudad de Bayawan de la Provincia de Negros Oriental, durante una misión que investigaba presuntas violaciones de derechos territoriales en la zona.

La sobreviven cuatro hijxs.

 


 

Elisa Badayos, Philippines

Economía solidaria

Definición

La economía solidaria (que incluye la economía cooperativa y la llamada economía del don) es un marco alternativo que adquiere formas diferentes según el contexto y está siempre abierto a los cambios.

Este marco de referencia se asienta sobre los siguientes principios:

  • solidaridad, mutualismo (ayuda mutua), y cooperación
  • equidad en todas las dimensiones
  • bienestar social
  • sostenibilidad
  • democracia social y económica
  • pluralismo

En una economía solidaria, quienes producen participan en procesos económicos que guardan íntima relación con sus realidades, con la preservación del medio ambiente y la cooperación mutua.

Contexto

Según la geógrafa feminista Yvonne Underhill-Sem, la economía del don es un sistema económico en el que los bienes y servicios circulan entre las personas sin que haya acuerdos explícitos acerca de su valor o de una reciprocidad esperada en el futuro.

Lo que hay detrás del otorgamiento de dones es una relación humana, una generación de buena voluntad y el acto de prestar atención a nutrir a toda la sociedad y no solo a lo que concierne a unx mismx y su familia: se trata del colectivo.

En el Pacífico, por ejemplo, esto se manifiesta en la recolección, preparación y procesamiento de recursos terrestres y marinos para tejer alfombras, abanicos, guirnaldas y objetos ceremoniales, así como en la cría de ganado y el almacenamiento de las cosechas estacionales.

Perspectiva feminista

Las mujeres tienen diversos incentivos para involucrarse en actividades económicas y que van desde satisfacer sus aspiraciones profesionales y ganar dinero para gozar de una vida confortable en el largo plazo hasta llegar a fin de mes, pagar deudas y huir del desgaste de una vida rutinaria.

Para acomodarse a los diferentes ambientes en los que operan las mujeres, el concepto de economía solidaria está en permanente desarrollo, discusión y debate.


Para leer más acerca de esta propuesta:


 

¿Cuánto tiempo toma responder la encuesta?

El tiempo estimado para responder la encuesta es de 30 minutos.

Snippet FEA Agroecology And Food (EN)

AGROECOLOGY AND FOOD SOVEREIGNTY AS RESISTANCE

Today, large-scale industrial food production uses single-crop plantations, genetically modified organisms and other pesticides that destroy the land and knowledge of local communities.

Agroecology is a resistance to corporate-driven agriculture. It prioritizes smaller scale agriculture, multiple crops and diversified food production, and the centering of local knowledge and practices. Agroecology goes hand-in-hand with demands for food sovereignty, or the “right of peoples to healthy and culturally appropriate food produced through ecologically sound and sustainable methods, and their right to define their own food and agriculture systems”(Via Campesina, Declaration of Nyéléni).

The role of women, indigenous and rural communities and people of color from the Global South is absolutely essential when it comes to food systems. Feminist agroecologists are working to dismantle oppressive gender roles and systems of patriarchy embedded within food production. As shown by the heroines of NSS, they are generating a liberatory agroecology by strengthening community resilience, empowering women peasants and farmers, and preserving local traditions, territories, and knowledge of food-producing communities.

Guadalupe Campanur Tapia

Guadalupe était une activiste environnementale impliquée dans la lutte contre le crime à Cherán, au Mexique.

En 2011, Guadalupe a aidé à renverser le gouvernement local. Elle participait à des patrouilles de sécurité locale, notamment dans les forêts municipales et faisait partie des dirigeant-e-s autochtones de Cherán qui ont appelé les gens à défendre leurs forêts contre l’abattage implacable et illégal. Son travail pour les aînés, les enfants, les travailleurs-euses a fait d'elle une icône dans sa communauté.

Elle a été assassinée à Chilchota, au Mexique, à environ 30 kilomètres au nord de Cherán, sa ville natale.

 


 

Guadalupe Campanur Tapia, Mexico

Un cadre alternatif pour la gouvernance économique

Le contexte

La crise économique mondiale actuelle fournit la preuve évidente que les politiques économiques des trois dernières décennies n’ont pas fonctionné.

La dévastation que la crise a opéré sur les ménages les plus vulnérables dans les pays du Nord et du Sud nous rappelle que la formulation de politiques économiques et la réalisation des droits humains (économiques, sociaux, politiques, civils et culturels) ont été trop longtemps séparées l’une de l'autre. La politique économique et les droits humains ne doivent pas être des forces opposées, elles peuvent coexister en symbiose.

Les politiques macroéconomiques influencent le fonctionnement de l'économie dans son ensemble, elles façonnent la disponibilité et la distribution des ressources. Dans ce contexte, les politiques budgétaires et monétaires sont fondamentales.

Définition

  • La politique budgétaire se réfère à la fois aux recettes et aux dépenses publiques, et aux relations entre elles qui sont formulées dans le budget de l’État.

  • La politique monétaire regroupe les politiques sur les intérêts et les taux de change et la masse monétaire, ainsi que la réglementation du secteur financier.

  • Les politiques macroéconomiques sont mises en œuvre à l’aide d'instruments tels la fiscalité, les dépenses du gouvernement, et le contrôle entre la masse monétaire et le crédit.

Ces politiques affectent les taux d’intérêt et les taux de change qui ont une influence directe sur, entre autres choses, le niveau de l'emploi, l'accès à un crédit abordable et le marché du logement.

L'application d'un cadre de droits humains aux politiques macroéconomiques permet aux États de mieux se conformer à leur obligation de respecter, de protéger et de réaliser les droits économiques et sociaux. Les droits humains sont inscrits aux conventions internationales selon des normes universelles. Ces normes juridiques sont énoncées dans les traités des Nations Unies tels la Déclaration universelle des droits de l'homme (DUDH), le Pacte international relatif aux droits civils et politiques (PIDCP) et le Pacte international relatif aux droits économiques, sociaux et culturels (PIDESC).

 L’Article 1 de la DUDH stipule que « Tous les êtres humains naissent libres et égaux en dignité et en droits ».

Bien que la DUDH ait été rédigée il y a près de six décennies, sa pertinence est toujours de mise. La plupart des principes énoncés répondent aux problèmes auxquels les gens continuent d’être confrontés à l'échelle mondiale. Les questions concernant les châtiments inhumains (art. 5), la discrimination (art. 7), la propriété (art. 17), un salaire égal pour un travail égal (art. 23/2), et l'accès à l'éducation (art. 26/1) sont des questions pertinentes tant pour les pays au Sud et au Nord de l'équateur.

En particulier, les États ont l'obligation, en vertu du droit international, de respecter, de protéger et de réaliser les droits humains, y compris les droits économiques et sociaux des personnes relevant de leur compétence. Cet aspect est particulièrement pertinent aujourd'hui, compte tenu de la crise financière. Aux États-Unis, la réglementation est faussée en faveur de certains intérêts. Dans le contexte du changement social et économique actuel, l'incapacité des gouvernements à étendre leur rôle de surveillance est un échec cuisant face à l’obligation de protéger les droits humains.

Perspective féministe

Les États devraient respecter les principes clés des droits humains pour réaliser les droits économiques et sociaux. Certains de ces principes ont des implications potentiellement importantes pour la gouvernance des institutions financières et des marchés. Ces possibilités ont été sous explorées jusqu’à présent.

Les droits économiques et sociaux ont un ancrage institutionnel et juridique concret. Les traités internationaux, les déclarations mondiales, les conventions, et, dans un certain nombre de cas, les constitutions nationales ont intégré certains aspects des cadres de droits économiques et sociaux, ce qui a permis l’élaboration d’infrastructures institutionnelles au niveau du droit national et international.

Certaines personnes avancent que l’idée d’une justice mondiale n’est peut-être pas un exercice utile en raison des complexités institutionnelles en jeu. Toutefois, les institutions mondiales ont sans aucun doute des incidences sur la justice sociale, à la fois positives et négatives.

Il est utile de déterminer ce que ces éléments des cadres alternatifs impliquent pour la gouvernance économique, en particulier ceux qui sont soutenus par les institutions existantes. Le cadre des droits économiques et sociaux est un bon exemple concret : ce cadre évolue constamment et les discussions et les délibérations en cours sont nécessaires afin d'aborder les sections sous développées et les lacunes potentielles.


Pour en savoir plus sur cette proposition :

Cette section est fondée sur le blog du CWGL intitulé Applying a Human Rights Framework to Macroeconomic Policies (L'application d'un cadre de droits humains aux politiques macroéconomiques, 2012).

Je ne me sens pas à l’aise à l’idée de communiquer le nom de mon groupe et nos coordonnées à l’AWID. Puis-je quand même participer à l’enquête?

Tout à fait, ces questions sont facultatives, et nous reconnaissons votre droit à l’anonymat. Merci de répondre aux questions de l’enquête, peu importe votre décision quant à la mention du nom de votre groupe, organisation et/ou mouvement et de vos coordonnées.

Snippet FEA Bio fertilizer and Sum-Pack (ES)

ILUSTRACIÓN DE PRODUCTOS NSS: Fertilizante orgánico y Sum-Pack - Cubitos de caldo natural

Ursula K Le Guin

Ursula was an American novelist who worked mainly in the genres of fantasy and science fiction.

She found fame with The Left Hand Of Darkness, which imagines a future society where people are ambisexual – they have no fixed sex. It explores the effects of gender and sex in society, and was one of the first major feminist science fiction books. Ursula was inspiring in her subversive and original writing, and also for the themes of feminism and freedom she held so dearly.

In a 1983 address at Mills College in California, she told graduates: “Why should a free woman with a college education either fight Macho-man or serve him? Why should she live her life on his terms? I hope you live without the need to dominate, and without the need to be dominated.”

 


 

Ursula K Le Guin, USA