Absolutely. These questions are optional, we value your right to remain anonymous. Please fill the survey regardless of your decision to share the name and contact information of your group, organization and/or movement.

Ahora que has analizado toda la información que recogiste — de la encuesta, las entrevistas, la investigación secundaria y otras fuentes que hayas utilizado — ya puedes generar el producto final.

En esta sección:

• El producto final
  1. Escribe con claridad
  2. Consigue que tenga un aspecto atractivo
• Revisión y comentarios
  1. Pule los resultados
  2. Facilita los comentarios

El producto final

El producto final será un documento que resume, analiza y critica la información que obtuviste. Será lo que compartas con la audiencia cuando les presentes tu investigación y se la expliques.

En AWID por lo general elaboramos un informe escrito exhaustivo en el que analizamos cada conjunto de información y sintetizamos todos los resultados que encontramos, para luego generar productos más breves como infografías o resúmenes (que explicaremos en la sección siguiente, «Finalización y formato»).

1. Escribe con claridad

• Organiza la información según cómo te gustaría contar la historia. Puedes respetar el orden de la encuesta. O reagrupar algunas preguntas para que la conclusión surja de manera fluida y siga una progresión lógica.
• Adapta el lenguaje al público. Utiliza un lenguaje universal y evita las jergas o los términos demasiado técnicos.

La importancia de la edición

El trabajo de edición implica corregir el texto, garantizar que la redacción sea concisa, revisar que los datos proporcionados sean exactos, señalar las inconsistencias que se deben resolver, acomodar el texto para que fluya y posiblemente también sugerir títulos.

Lo ideal es que la persona que haga este trabajo entienda y conozca tu labor en cuanto a WITM pero que no haya participado directamente de la investigación, así puede aportar una perspectiva nueva.

2. Consigue que el producto tenga un aspecto atractivo

• Utiliza la información recogida para generar gráficos y tablas. Estas herramientas visuales constituyen una forma atractiva de subrayar los principales resultados de la investigación y validar los análisis.
• Busca imágenes relevantes que puedan ilustrar el informe.
• Destaca las principales cifras y/o los testimonios de impacto.

Recuerda: Cuanto más accesible sea el producto, más personas querrán leerlo (y compartirlo).

Volver al comienzo

Revisión y comentarios

Cuando llegues a este momento, ya habrás compilado toda la información, la habrás analizado y convertido en un producto final, que probablemente sea un informe extenso.

1. Pule los resultados

Antes de encarar los pasos siguientes deberías compartir el producto final con organizaciones, activistas y donantes que puedan comentarlo (lxs «consultorxs»).

Este es un momento excelente para pedirles que revisen lo siguiente:

• ¿Hay algo fundamental que esté ausente delanálisis del panorama actual del financiamiento y sus tendencias?
• ¿Hay algo fundamental que esté ausente de las conclusiones?
• ¿Hay alguna inexactitud en la información que necesite ser corregida?
• ¿Tienen alguna sugerencia general sobre cómo fortalecer el informe para que cumpla con las metas que habías mencionado en el marco de la investigación?

Una vez que hayas incorporado todos los comentarios de las personas a las que consultaste, asegúrate de que la persona a cargo de la edición vuelva a revisar el informe.

Con esto ya tendrás la versión final y completa del informe. Si quieres publicarlo en otros idiomas, ahora es el momento de enviarlo a traducir.

2. Facilita los comentarios

• Es probable que las personas a las que consultes estén ocupadas con su trabajo habitual. Asegúrate de darles un plazo razonable para que te hagan llegar sus comentarios.
• Pídeles comentarios breves y específicos, para que les resulte fácil responder. Si quieres, puedes simplemente copiar y pegar los puntos que mencionamos en la sección anterior.
• Si vas a publicar el informe en varios idiomas, asegúrate de contar con personas que también puedan revisar las versiones finales traducidas de el/los producto/s.

Las personas que revisen el informe (lxs «consultorxs») te estarán haciendo un aporte significativo. Considera la posibilidad de otorgarles alguna forma de reconocimiento.

Volver al comienzo

Paso previo

6. Realiza una investigación secundaria

Paso siguiente

8. Finalización y formato

Duración estimada

• 2 - 5 meses

Personas que se necesitan

• 1 persona (o más) de investigación
• 1 Editor (editor web o si crea un producto en línea)
• Traductores (si ofrece encuesta en varios idiomas)

Recursos necesarios

• Lista de organizaciones de asesores, activistas y financiadores.
• Documento de Síntesis (sección de "marco de su investigación")
• Los resultados de su(s) encuesta(s)
• Preguntas de la entrevista
• Resultados de las entrevistas
• Los datos de la investigación secundaria
• Todos otros datos utilizados en el informe

Paso previo

6. Realiza una investigación secundaria

Paso siguiente

8. Finalización y formato

Planilla «¿Estoy listx?»

Descargar el manual en PDF

Analizaremos las respuestas a la encuesta para extraer conclusiones y tendencias, y presentaremos los resultados durante el 15º Foro Internacional de AWID en Bangkok y en línea, en diciembre de 2024. Para asistir al Foro, puedes inscribirte aquí.

Definition

There are varied conceptualizations about the commons notes activist and scholar Soma Kishore Parthasarathy.

Conventionally, they are understood as natural resources intended for use by those who depend on their use. However, the concept of the commons has expanded to include the resources of knowledge, heritage, culture, virtual spaces, and even climate. It pre-dates the individual property regime and provided the basis for organization of society. Definitions given by government entities limit its scope to land and material resources.

The concept of the commons rests on the cultural practice of sharing livelihood spaces and resources as nature’s gift, for the common good, and for the sustainability of the common.

Context

Under increasing threat, nations and market forces continue to colonize, exploit and occupy humanity’s commons.

In some favourable contexts, the ‘commons’ have the potential to enable women, especially economically oppressed women, to have autonomy in how they are able to negotiate their multiple needs and aspirations.

Feminist perspective

Patriarchy is reinforced when women and other oppressed genders are denied access and control of the commons.

Therefore, a feminist economy seeks to restore the legitimate rights of communities to these common resources. This autonomy is enabling them to sustain themselves; while evolving more egalitarian systems of governance and use of such resources. A feminist economy acknowledges women’s roles and provides equal opportunities for decision-making, i.e. women as equal claimants to these resources.

Learn more about this proposition

• Reclaiming the Commons for Gender and Economic Justice: Struggles and Movements in India is an interview to scholar Soma Kishore Parthasarathy on how women in rural India are contesting this reality by proposing a shared management of common resources.
• Feminism And The Politics Of The Commons by Silvia Federici looks at the politics of the commons from a feminist standpoint shaped by the struggle against sexual discrimination and reproductive work, to clarify the conditions under which the principle of the common/s can become the foundation of an anti-capitalist program.

لجعل الواقع المركّب لتمويل الأشكال المختلفة من التنظيم النسوي، مرئي

Despite their rigidity in matters of doctrine and worldview, anti-rights actors have demonstrated an openness to building new kinds of strategic alliances, to new organizing techniques, and to new forms of rhetoric. As a result, their power in international spaces has increased.

There has been a notable evolution in the strategies of ultra conservative actors operating at this level. They do not only attempt to tinker at the edges of agreements and block certain language, but to transform the framework conceptually and develop alternative standards and norms, and avenues for influence.

Strategy 1: Training of UN delegates

Ultra conservative actors work to create and sustain their relationships with State delegates through regular training opportunities - such as the yearly Global Family Policy Forum - and targeted training materials.

These regular trainings and resources systematically brief delegates on talking points and negotiating techniques to further collaboration towards anti-rights objectives in the human rights system. Delegates also receive curated compilations of ‘consensus language’ and references to pseudo-scientific or statistical information to bolster their arguments.

The consolidated transmission of these messages explains in part why State delegates who take ultra-conservative positions in international human rights debates frequently do so in contradiction with their own domestic legislation and policies.

Strategy 2: Holding international convenings

Anti-rights actors’ regional and international web of meetings help create closer links between ultra conservative Civil Society Organizations (CSOs), States and State blocs, and powerful intergovernmental bodies. The yearly international World Congress of Families is one key example.

These convenings reinforce personal connections and strategic alliances, a key element for building and sustaining movements. They facilitate transnational, trans-religious and dynamic relationship-building around shared issues and interests, which leads to a more proactive approach and more holistic sets of asks at the international policy level on the part of anti-rights actors.

Strategy 3: Placing reservations on human rights agreements

States and State blocs have historically sought to undermine international consensus or national accountability under international human rights norms through reservations to human rights agreements, threatening the universal applicability of human rights.  

The Convention on the Elimination of Discrimination Against Women (CEDAW) has received by far the most reservations, most of which are based on alleged conflict with religious law. It is well-established international human rights law that evocations of tradition, culture or religion cannot justify violations of human rights, and many reservations to CEDAW are invalid as they are “incompatible with the object and purpose” of CEDAW. Nevertheless, reference to these reservations is continually used by States to dodge their human rights responsibilities.

‘Reservations’ to UN documents and agreements that are not formal treaties - such as Human Rights Council and General Assembly resolutions - are also on the rise.

Strategy 4: Creating a parallel human rights framework

In an alarming development, regressive actors at the UN have begun to co-opt existing rights standards and campaign to develop agreed language that is deeply anti-rights.

The aim is to create and then propagate language in international human rights spaces that validates patriarchal, hierarchical, discriminatory, and culturally relativist norms.

One step towards this end is the drafting of declarative texts, such as the World Family Declaration and the San Jose Articles, that pose as soft human rights law. Sign-ons are gathered from multiple civil society, state, and institutional actors; and they are then used a basis for advocacy and lobbying.

Strategy 5: Developing  alternative ‘scientific’ sources

As part of a strategic shift towards the use of non-religious discourses, anti-rights actors have significantly invested in their own ‘social science’ think tanks. Given oxygen by the growing conservative media, materials from these think tanks are then widely disseminated by conservative civil society groups. The same materials are used as the basis for advocacy at the international human rights level.  

While the goals and motivation of conservative actors derive from their extreme interpretations of religion, culture, and tradition, such regressive arguments are often reinforced through studies that claim intellectual authority. A counter-discourse is thus produced through a heady mix of traditionalist doctrine and social science.

Strategy 6: Mobilizing Youth

This is one of the most effective strategies employed by the religious right and represents a major investment in the future of anti-rights organizing.

Youth recruitment and leadership development, starting at the local level with churches and campuses, are a priority for many conservative actors engaged at the international policy level.  

This strategy has allowed for infiltration of youth-specific spaces at the United Nations, including at the Commission on the Status of Women, and creates a strong counterpoint to progressive youth networks and organizations.

Strategy 7: Defunding and delegitimizing human rights mechanisms

When it comes to authoritative expert mechanisms like the UN Special Procedures and Treaty Monitoring Bodies and operative bodies like the UN agencies, regressive groups realize their potential for influence is much lower than with political mechanisms^[1].

In response, anti-rights groups spread the idea that UN agencies are ‘overstepping their mandate,’ that the CEDAW Committee and other Treaty Bodies have no authority to interpret their treaties, or that Special Procedures are partisan experts working outside of their mandate. Anti-rights groups have also successfully lobbied for the defunding of agencies such as the United Nations Population Fund (UNFPA).

This invalidation of UN mechanisms gives fuel to state impunity. Governments, when under international scrutiny, can defend their action on the basis that the reviewing mechanism is itself faulty or overreaching.

Strategy 8: Organizing online

Conservative non-state actors increasingly invest in social media and other online platforms to promote their activities, campaign, and widely share information from international human rights spaces.

The Spanish organization CitizenGo, for example, markets itself as the conservative version of Change.org, spearheading petitions and letter-writing campaigns. One recent petition, opposing the establishment of a UN international day on safe abortion, gathered over 172,000 signatures.

Overarching Trends:

• Learning from the organizing strategies of feminists and other progressives.
• Replicating and adapting successful national-level tactics for the international sphere.
• Moving from an emphasis on ‘symbolic protest’ to becoming subversive system ‘insiders.’

By understanding the strategies employed by anti-rights actors, we can be more effective in countering them.

[1] The fora that are state-led, like the General Assembly, the Human Rights Council, and UN conferences like the Commission on the Status of Women and the Commission on Population and Development

Other Chapters

• Key impacts on the international human rights system
• Key opposition actors
• Key opposition discourses

Read the full report

Other Chapters

• Key impacts on the international human rights system
• Key opposition actors
• Key opposition discourses

Read the full report

« Mes rêves et mes objectifs ont toujours été les mêmes que ceux de Lohana Berkins : que la coopérative continue à exister et non à fermer. Continuez à offrir cet endroit à nos collègues travesti, à leur donner du travail et un lieu de soutien»

Brisa Escobar,
présidente de la Coopérative